Temasek declares dividends annually to its shareholder. Despite being an exempt private company, Temasek has voluntarily published its annual financial and performance report, the Temasek Review, since 2004. And Temasek pays taxes, just like any other company, in Singapore and anywhere else in the world they fall due.
As a commercial company, Temasek is governed by an independent board, the majority of whom are non-executive and independent private sector business leaders.
The evolution of Temasek towards full responsibility for the appointment and renewal of Board and management personnel was articulated by former Temasek Chairman Mr S Dhanabalan (Chairman of Temasek Holdings, 1996-2013), at Temasek’s 39th anniversary dinner, where he shared:
“Entrusting of the board and management to conduct business and to plan and execute succession without political interference makes us unique in the community of state-owned enterprises.”
Speaking at Temasek’s 40th anniversary dinner a year later, then President of Singapore, Dr Tony Tan Keng Yam, further remarked that it was this clear distinction of role that allowed Singapore firms to be “free of political patronage and compete on level playing field”.
The relationship between Temasek and its sole shareholder, the Minister for Finance, is similar to the relationship between Temasek and its portfolio companies. Neither the President nor the Government is involved in Temasek’s investment or other business and corporate decisions, except in relation to the President’s role in the protection of Temasek’s reserves. Similarly, Temasek does not direct the business decisions and operations of its portfolio companies. Instead, Temasek expects the boards and management of these companies to take responsibility and accountability for their actions and activities. For instance, Singapore Airlines (SIA) makes independent decisions on the selection of its aircraft and routes based on commercial considerations, without any direction from Temasek. As former Temasek Chairman Mr S Dhanabalan shared back in 2010, “When Singtel wants to buy the second largest telecoms company, they did not consult Temasek. When SIA bought billions of dollars of planes, we only read about this in the newspaper.”
Over the years, successive Finance Ministers, from Mr Hon Sui Sen (Finance Minister 1970-1983) to Mr Heng Swee Keat (Finance Minister 2015-2021) have also publicly affirmed that Temasek is expected to be run with commercial discipline. During an interview in 2019, Mr Heng Swee Keat expressed, as then-Finance Minister, that he had never interfered with the investment decisions of Temasek and GIC. He added that according to the Constitution, the Finance Minister is responsible to Parliament for the performance of these firms, and he in turn holds these firms accountable.
This same perspective is shared in Mr Heng’s responses to various parliamentary questions. For example, in a written response to a parliamentary question in 2016, Mr Heng shared:
“The individual investments of GIC and Temasek are the responsibility of their respective management teams, while the Government monitors the performance of their overall portfolio. GIC and Temasek operate on a purely commercial basis in order to maximise long term risk-adjusted returns, and the individual investment decisions are fully independent of any Government interference or influence. This is an important governance principle that we seek to maintain.”
In his address at Temasek’s 39th anniversary dinner in 2013, then Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore and Minister for Finance, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, explained:
“On its part, the Government’s approach is to ensure that people of sound character and judgment are appointed to the [Temasek] Board, to guide Temasek’s management and its strategies… This alignment in our thinking on the governance of Temasek remains an important advantage for the future. The Government holds the Board accountable for Temasek’s performance over time. Temasek has the flexibility to seize opportunities when they arise, and to take calculated risks aimed at growing the value of its portfolio over the long term.”